Discussion about this post

User's avatar
ChinArb's avatar

The $1 Trillion "Firmware Update" for China Inc.

Mainstream media sees China's $1 Trillion debt plan as "Stimulus". ChinArb sees it as "Industrial Refinancing."

Look at where the money is going:

"Two New's": Equipment upgrades (Robots/Machinery).

"Two Keys": Strategic security (Energy/Supply Chain).

"Five Chapters": Tech & Green Finance.

This is not money for consumption (Inflationary). This is money for Capacity & Efficiency (Deflationary).

China is borrowing $1T to lower the entropy of its manufacturing base even further. If you are competing against China in 2026, you are not competing against a company; you are competing against a Sovereign Capex Budget.

Dr Warwick Powell's avatar

If the aim is to “fight deflation” the rate of systemic liquidity expansion must be greater than productivity growth and the effects of competition. But the problem, so to speak, isn’t “deflation in general”. The issue as always is the distributional effects of changes in price trajectory, whether it’s inflationary or deflationary. There is an argument that liquidity expansion can be accelerated beyond current levels; put the other way, the authorities have remained a little on the cautious side in their management of the faucet. Additionally, addressing local government debt structurally will actually free up the flow of pent up capital resources. Monetary policy is unlikely to be that meaningful in any of this other than by way of the PBOC actively seeking to govern liquidity through market actions.

No posts

Ready for more?